Was browsing in Waterstones today...
Oct. 1st, 2008 08:42 pm![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
...I've been resisting (more or less) peeking at Nation, because I don't want to spoil it[1], but The Illustrated Wee Free Men came out this week, and I thought "Well, I already know the story, so spoilers don't really apply". I was planning on getting it for my neice for Christmas[2], and now I'm not sure I can wait that long.
There are Feegles interlaced in the text (sometimes stealing words). There's fold-out pages. There are bits where signage and writing is in the illustrations rather than the text. There's the court transcript of the events leading to a certain lawyer being turned into a toad (and we learn his name is Mr Natter, which is a wonderful name for a toad who's actually a lawyer). And the illustrations themselves are brilliant.
I may have to order this one from the library as well.
[1]It's on order from the library. If I go around buying the autumn Pratchett, my entire Christmas list is thrown into disarray.
[2]Pending her mother's approval, which I'm pretty confident about.
There are Feegles interlaced in the text (sometimes stealing words). There's fold-out pages. There are bits where signage and writing is in the illustrations rather than the text. There's the court transcript of the events leading to a certain lawyer being turned into a toad (and we learn his name is Mr Natter, which is a wonderful name for a toad who's actually a lawyer). And the illustrations themselves are brilliant.
I may have to order this one from the library as well.
[1]It's on order from the library. If I go around buying the autumn Pratchett, my entire Christmas list is thrown into disarray.
[2]Pending her mother's approval, which I'm pretty confident about.
no subject
Date: 2008-10-01 11:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 12:22 pm (UTC)(My mum and sister borrow them, so they really understand. The rest of the family just accept it's something I really like.)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 08:59 am (UTC)Oh wonderful! Is his first name Jack, by any chance? :-)
no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 12:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-10-02 01:04 pm (UTC)True. I think Jack is short for John rather than James, but it's still a nice touch.